There is no denying that Greivis Vasquez will leave a legacy for the Maryland Terrapins. Go ahead and tuck that statement away in your “duh” folder. But what kind of legacy will it be? THAT is the question. And it is a question that only the big lights…the big stage…the big tamale…THE BIG DANCE…can answer. This tournament, she can be a many-spendored maiden, but also a cruel and shiftless hag. If Vasquez hopes to attain a legacy among the very very best, she is a maiden he will have to tame.
The numbers and accolades are there. Everyone knows that. Let’s briefly run them down again, just because it’s fun to do and impressive to see when they’re all listed out. Greivis Vasquez is now 10 points behind Len Bias for second on Maryland’s all-time scoring list. First ACC player in history with 2,000 points, 600 rebounds, and 700 assists. ACC Player of the Year, first-team All-American, Wooden Award finalist. To tread some even ruttier ground, he matured as a person as well as a player to become the clear leader of a team that overacheived in his final season. No one disputes any of that. I do not dispute that. You do not dispute that. The American people do not dispute that.
But now we must discuss his postseason record, which is a bit less sparkling.
Because I refuse to compare any other past, current, or future player to Juan Dixon or Len Bias, let’s use the great Steve Blake as a point of comparison. His stats and accolades aren’t quite as gaudy as Greivis Vasquez’s, although he holds the school assists record and sits fourth and fifth on the ACC and NCAA all-time lists, respectively, and was first-team All-ACC his senior season. But legacy-wise, Blake, I feel, is on slightly more solid footing than Vasquez at the moment. Not only did Blake win one national championship and reach two Final Fours, but he made the tournament all four years. This, of course, includes a 2002-2003 senior year in which Blake and Drew “The Specialist” Nicholas led the Terps to a Sweet 16 berth on will, guts, and luck. I liked that season’s team almost as much as the two that preceded it.
Vasquez is in a different situation. He has made the big tourney three of his four seasons, and amassed a 2-2 record there. His tourney stats are actually darn good — 15 points per game on 47 percent shooting, four rebounds, four assists — so it’s not an individual performance issue. And granted, Greivis is a victim of circumstances here to some extent, as he didn’t get to come up with a Dixon or a Baxter. Does this mean that Blake’s legacy is largely the result of team accomplishments rather than individual ones, whereas Vasquez’s legacy is, to this point, the opposite? Yes. Does this make the comparison unfair? Well, yes. But is it the reality of legacies? Yes. When you look back on Vasquez — or any player — what are you gonna think about first, numbers or postseason success? Right. That’s American sports culture. Maybe just American culture period. Just give me the bottom line: what did you win? How far did you get?
The good news for Greivis is that a good tourney run in his last and best season as a Terp would wash away the disappointment of previous seasons. There’s no excuses this year, no dead wood or insurmountable weaknesses on the team, no drama. Just a good team, led by a great player, playing ball. It has all lined up for Greivis Vasquez, and now he just has to execute.
Maryland hasn’t made the Sweet 16 since 2003. (Remember when Terp fans used to complain about never getting PAST the Sweet 16? I know…spoiled jerks. None of us did that, right? Right.) By winning two ball games in the dance, Vasquez could get us back to the second weekend of the tourney and leave triumphantly. And it’s doable. Despite some predictions to the contrary, Houston should be easily had. Michigan State is great, and their grind-you-down pickup truck style is dangerous for a Ferrari team like Maryland, but they’re not exactly the 1993 Bulls either. These are not easy games, but they are winnable. We can make the Sweet 16.
Imagine if Greivis could carry the team even farther. As it stands, he’s exactly 120 points behind Juan Dixon on the all-time scoring list. That’s 20 points a game for six games.
But back to Earth now. If Vasquez’s Maryland Terps lose in the first or second round, he’ll be remembered fondly as a great player and one of the most “colorful” Terps of all time. We’ll look back, and we’ll smile. If he gets the team farther, and helps to reestablish them as a force to be reckoned with in March, we’ll look back with a different set of emotions. I want that different set, and, I’m guessing, so does he.


















